Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Arizona Sucks



Illegal immigration is a real problem our country must deal with, especially in those states who share a border with our neighbors to the south, Mexico. Every day non-tax paying immigrants cross our borders illegally to take advantage of our already taxed education, healthcare, and social services systems. If something’s not done the tax-paying citizens of the United States will continue to suffer. Arizona Senate Bill 1070, which was recently passed into law and signed by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on April 23, 2010, is NOT the answer however.

SB1070 legislation does the following:

• Makes it a state misdemeanor crime for anyone to be unable to prove lawful residence in the United States upon being asked to provide such proof

• Requires police to make a reasonable attempt, when practical, to determine immigration status if there is cause to suspect they are illegal immigrants

• Provides that Arizona citizens can sue such agencies or officials to compel full enforcement of the law

Or to put it another way it transforms Arizona into a police state where anyone who’s not pearly white must carry proof of citizenship with them at all times, or risk being fined and thrown into jail. Furthermore it promotes racial profiling by forcing police to question the immigration status of anyone who’s not pearly white, or otherwise risk being sued by the fine citizens of Arizona for not enforcing the law. I’m sorry, but is it 2010 or 1810? Are you fucking serious, Arizona? This is insanity.

The bill, with a number of changes made to it, passed the Arizona House of Representatives on April 13, by a 35–21 party-line vote. The revised measure then passed the State Senate on April 19, by a 17-11 vote that also closely followed party lines, with all but one Republican voting for the bill, ten Democrats voting against the bill, and two Democrats not voting. More troubling however is the proportion of voters in the state of Arizona who favored the bill. A Rasmussen Reports poll indicated that it held wide support among likely voters in the state, with 70 percent in favor against 23 percent opposed, although a majority of voters were also concerned that actions taken due to the bill would violate the civil rights of some American citizens. Gee, you think? Yet you still favor the bill. What’s wrong with you, Arizona?

Governor Brewer had been silent on whether she would sign the measure, but facing a Republican Party primary challenge from more conservative opponents, she did. Because after all re-election is more important than moral integrity, right Governor Brewer? Against concerns that the bill would promote racial profiling, Brewer stated that no such behavior would be tolerated: "We must enforce the law evenly, and without regard to skin color, accent or social status.” How is that even possible, Jan? She then vowed to ensure that police forces had proper training relative to the law and civil rights. Ultimately, she said, "We have to trust our law enforcement.” God help us all. Giving more power to the police and expecting them not to abuse it is like providing state senators with unlimited booze and hookers and expecting them to stay sober and abstinent.

Thousands of people staged protests in state capital Phoenix over the law, and a pro-migrant activist called the measure "racist". The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials said SB1070 was "an unconstitutional and costly measure that will violate the civil rights of all Arizonans." Some Latino leaders have compared the law to Apartheid in South Africa, Nazi Germany, or the Japanese American internment during World War II. Proponents of the law scoffed at such inflated rhetoric, and argued that the law was reasonable, limited, and carefully crafted. Yeah and I bet you’d argue that evolution never took place either, am I right?

The legislation is considered constitutionally vulnerable by some, who claim that the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution gives the federal government authority over the states in immigration matters and that only the federal government can enact and enforce immigration laws. Drafters of the bill however said it would survive any challenge: "There are some things that states can do and some that states can't do, but this law threads the needle perfectly.... Arizona only penalizes what is already a crime under federal law,” stated Professor Kris Kobach, the primary drafter of the bill (hmmm - I wonder if his middle name starts with a ‘K’ too?). State Senator Pearce noted that some past state laws on immigration enforcement had been upheld in federal courts, and called the bill's signing "a good day for America.” A good day for America, my ass. Pull your head out Senator Pearce. You suck and so does Arizona.

1 comment:

Thomas said...

Except for the last of the 3 provisions you mention, the first two are federal enforcement bylaws of the U.S. Border Patrol. This simply takes existing enforcement principles and now transfers the power from federal to state law enforcement.

I'm somewhat shocked by the backlash, although certainly the law passed will need to be repealed. What did everyone expect Arizona to do?

Since the Feds are intent on doing exactly nothing (which they've been extremely good at) for the past 2 decades, as it pertains to border security and law enforcement, this law is the natural "you've painted us into a corner" reaction. Which nearly 65% of zoners approve of.

This was a desperate move by people who are becoming desperate to maintain order in a state that is slowly descending into chaos, while Napalitano does nothing. Until the government does its job and puts a stop to the rampant human trafficking, drug runners, and execution of land owners along the border, Arizona will probably to continue to restrict, or at least attempt to restrict the civil rights of segments of the population, most notably the illegal ones. Secure the border, and crazy laws like this will go away instantly.